Imagine my surprise when I clicked over to WorkforceDevelopments the other day only to find Meg Whitman's face smiling at me from an ad in the right column.
Meg - since she's advertising on my blog we must be on a first name basis - is running for governor of California. Why anyone would want to play nanny to a notoriously ungovernable state that's running a $21 billion deficit is beyond me, but that's for another day. Meg's biggest claim to fame (and source of money to bankroll a run for gov) is that she used to be CEO of eBay.
Why in the world would someone I'd never vote for buy space on my li'l ol' blog? I was immediately worried that readers might think her appearance here constituted my endorsement.
Then again, maybe Meg's been trolling the web for new job-creation ideas and was impressed my posts calling for a New Deal-type program to put people back to work. Or she's been reading conversations in the comments (and here) between unemployed workers helping each other figure out how to access their benefits and decided this a good site to reach Real Americans.
Which gave me a moment's pause. I shouldn't dismiss her candidacy out of hand. Maybe someone who ran a company that changed the way Americans turn the stuff in their garages into cash has innovative new ideas for these unprecedented economic times. And California's never had a woman governor - why not now? So I clicked the ad to find out what Meg's all about.
Turns out Create Jobs is one of her three main platform issues. Two million of them in five years, to be exact. She'll start by laying off 30-40,000 state employees.
What else will Meg do to create all those jobs? Cut taxes and eliminate regulations while building infrastructure for water, energy and transportation. Yawn. I think we've seen that movie before. And in the midst of one of the biggest federal green jobs investments in history, she seems to think that environmentalists don't like jobs.
I don't think she's been reading my blog.
Now I'm left with this conundrum: Should I throw Meg off? I use a third-party provider to handle those flashy ads so I don't see them before they appear. The ad company takes most of the profits and sends me a few pennies per click. However, I do have the ability to block ads that promote things I don't support.
So I leave the question with you, dear reader. Please vote:
Most of the posts you read here are written by me. In addition, Racy Ming writes an excellent monthly post on 




Recent Comments